Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6.1 SolvsQwen3 4B Instruct 2507

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GPT-6.1 Sol leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6.1 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-29
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
24 · 9 core
Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Qwen · released 2025-08-06
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 4B Instruct 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
GPQA Diamond95.4% ↗epoch run45.8% ↗epoch run+49.6 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch run4% ↗epoch run+57 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch run52.2% ↗epoch run+47.8 ptGPT-6.1 Sol
Only GPT-6.1 Sol reports · 21
LMArena Elo1483.2 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)60% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)54.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)93.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)56.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)80.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)74.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)90.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.1123 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.6 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1757.8 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)80% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)46.5% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified73.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)55.1% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 reports · 15
MMLU-Pronot reported69.6% ↗——
Aider-Polyglotnot reported12.9% ↗——
AIME25not reported47.4% ↗——
Arena-Hard v2not reported43.4% ↗——
BFCL-v3not reported61.9% ↗——
GPQAnot reported62% ↗——
HMMT25not reported31% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported83.4% ↗——
LiveBench 20241125not reported63% ↗——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)not reported35.1% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported84.2% ↗——
MultiPL-Enot reported76.8% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported42.8% ↗——
TAU2-Retailnot reported40.4% ↗——
ZebraLogicnot reported80.2% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6.1 Sol minus Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3 4B Instruct 2507Edge
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6.1 Sol
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗——
Output price / 1M$10 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12——
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6.1 Sol
Released2026-09-292025-08-06—
Cited benchmark scores2418—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.