Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsMuse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads 8 of 15 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is 9.2x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
6 – 8
Muse Spark 1.2 leads · 1 tied
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
9.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Meta
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · released 2026-08-05
textvisionvideoaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
23 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.2ΔEdge
Reported by both · 15
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗1493.5 ↗-50.6Muse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗36.4% ↗+7.9 ptGPT-6 Luna
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗59.3% ↗+7.3 ptGPT-6 Luna
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗57.6% ↗-6.4 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗77.5% ↗+1.5 ptGPT-6 Luna
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗76.5% ↗-3.1 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗74.3% ↗-18.4 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗78.6% ↗-4.8 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗91.2% ↗-2.1 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗90% ↗-8.2 ptMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗-0.0327 ↗0Tie
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗1531.8 ↗+46.9GPT-6 Luna
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗47.7% ↗+0.4 ptGPT-6 Luna
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch run60.3% ↗epoch run-18.9 ptMuse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗6.1% ↗+7.5 ptGPT-6 Luna
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 7
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.2 reports · 8
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported54.9% ↗——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported12% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1292.8 ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported90.3% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported74.5% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported82.9% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported75.9% ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported60.3% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Muse Spark 1.2 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaMuse Spark 1.2Edge
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$1.25 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$4.25 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗$0.15 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$5.5GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · video · audioMuse Spark 1.2
Released2026-09-222026-08-05—
Cited benchmark scores2223—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.2 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Muse Spark 1.2 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.