Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 SolvsQwen3.5 0.8B

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5 0.8B do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GPT-6 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Sol
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
27 · 8 core
Qwen3.5 0.8B
Qwen · released 2026-03-02
textvisionvideo
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
14 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 0.8BΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only GPT-6 Sol reports · 27
GPQA Diamond94.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LMArena Elo1457.2 ↗not reported——
Agents' Last Exam V156.4% ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)54.3% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.633.2% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.168.8% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)53.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)90% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)89.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)58.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)52.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)81.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)68.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)85.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)96.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)88.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0971 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1689 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)56% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld 2.0 (offline, partial)60.5% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)100% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)44.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)73.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified60.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)44.4% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)14427.85 ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3.5 0.8B reports · 14
BFCL-V4 (thinking)not reported25.3% ↗——
GPQA (thinking)not reported11.9% ↗——
IFBench (thinking)not reported21% ↗——
IFEval (non-thinking)not reported52.1% ↗——
IFEval (thinking)not reported44% ↗——
LongBench v2 (thinking)not reported26.1% ↗——
MMLU-Pro (non-thinking)not reported29.7% ↗——
MMLU-Pro (thinking)not reported42.3% ↗——
MMLU-Redux (thinking)not reported59.5% ↗——
MMMLU (thinking)not reported44.3% ↗——
MMMU (thinking)not reported49% ↗——
MMMU-Pro (thinking)not reported31.2% ↗——
SuperGPQA (thinking)not reported21.3% ↗——
TAU2-Bench (thinking)not reported11.6% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Sol minus Qwen3.5 0.8B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 SolQwen3.5 0.8BEdge
Context window1.1M tokens262K tokensGPT-6 Sol
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗——
Output price / 1M$10 ↗——
Cached input / 1M$0.2 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12——
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoQwen3.5 0.8B
Released2026-09-222026-03-02—
Cited benchmark scores2714—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Sol vs …

More matchups

Qwen3.5 0.8B vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5 0.8B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.