Compare / head-to-head
Grok 4.6vsQwen3.7-Max
Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7-Max do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3.7-Max is 1.2x cheaper per token. Qwen3.7-Max has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.7-Max
1.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.7-Max
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
xAI · Qwen
Grok 4.6
xAI · released 2026-08-12
textvision
Qwen3.7-Max
Qwen · released 2026-05-20
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 15 only Grok 4.6 · 0 only Qwen3.7-Max| Benchmark | Grok 4.6 | Qwen3.7-Max | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Grok 4.6 reports · 15 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 94% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| AA-Briefcase | 1577 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents | 57.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-SWE | 56.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 61 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CursorBench 3.2 | 69.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 65.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) | 61.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 31.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 66% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | 1753 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Harvey LAB (Vals) | 15.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 99.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 49.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 26% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.7-Max reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.7-Max reports nothing Grok 4.6 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4.6 minus Qwen3.7-Max in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Grok 4.6 | Qwen3.7-Max | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 500K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.7-Max |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | $1.65 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Max |
| Output price / 1M | $6 ↗ | $4.95 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Max |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $8 | $6.6 | Qwen3.7-Max |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-08-12 | 2026-05-20 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 15 | 0 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Grok 4.6 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4.6 and Qwen3.7-Max on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.