ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Grok Build 0.1vsMiMo-V2.5-Pro

Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
both 256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
xAI · Xiaomi MiMo
Grok Build 0.1
xAI · released 2026-05-19
text
Context
256K
Max out
Input /1M
$1
Output /1M
$2
Cached /1M
$0.2
Scores
0 · 0 core
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi MiMo
text
Context
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-ProΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only Grok Build 0.1 reports · 0
Grok Build 0.1 reports nothing MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports · 1
LMArena Elonot reported1464.7
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok Build 0.1 minus MiMo-V2.5-Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok Build 0.1MiMo-V2.5-ProEdge
Context window256K tokens
Max output
Input price / 1M$1
Output price / 1M$2
Cached input / 1M$0.2
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$3
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2026-05-19
Cited benchmark scores01
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok Build 0.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.