Compare / head-to-head

Kimi K2.5vsSeed1.8

Kimi K2.5 leads 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Both offer a 256K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
5 – 0
Kimi K2.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 256K tokens
Providers
2 providers
Moonshot AI · ByteDance Seed
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI · released 2026-01-27
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
26 · 14 core
Seed1.8
ByteDance Seed · released 2025-12-18
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
64K
Input /1M
$0.25 ↗
Output /1M
$2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.05
Scores
16 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkKimi K2.5Seed1.8ΔEdge
Reported by both · 5
SWE-bench Verified76.8% ↗72.9% ↗+3.9 ptKimi K2.5
MMLU-Pro87.1% ↗84.9% ↗+2.2 ptKimi K2.5
GPQA-Diamond87.6% ↗83.8% ↗+3.8 ptKimi K2.5
OSWorld-Verified (XLANG)63.3% ↗61.9% ↗+1.4 ptKimi K2.5
Terminal Bench 2.050.8% ↗45.2% ↗+5.6 ptKimi K2.5
Only Kimi K2.5 reports · 21
AIME 202596.1% ↗not reported——
LMArena Elo1450.1 ↗not reported——
BrowseComp60.6% ↗not reported——
HLE-Full30.1% ↗not reported——
HLE-Full (w/ tools)50.2% ↗not reported——
HMMT 2025 (Feb)95.4% ↗not reported——
IMO-AnswerBench81.8% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench (v6)85% ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1252.2 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1435.8 ↗not reported——
MMMU-Pro78.5% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)46.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified34.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SWE-Bench Multilingual73% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro50.7% ↗not reported——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)73.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)33% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)1198.46 ↗not reported——
VideoMMMU86.6% ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)45.6% ↗not reported——
Only Seed1.8 reports · 11
AIME-25not reported94.3% ↗——
ARC-AGI-1not reported67.9% ↗——
BFCL-v4not reported57.2% ↗——
BrowseComp-ennot reported67.6% ↗——
HLE (text-only, agentic search)not reported40.9% ↗——
LiveCodeBench(v6)not reported79.5% ↗——
MM-BrowseCompnot reported46.3% ↗——
Multi-SWE-Benchnot reported42% ↗——
MultiChallengenot reported66.7% ↗——
WideSearchnot reported63.8% ↗——
τ2-Benchnot reported72% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Kimi K2.5 minus Seed1.8 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecKimi K2.5Seed1.8Edge
Context window256K tokens256K tokensTie
Max output—64K tokens—
Input price / 1M—$0.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$2 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.05 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$2.25—
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · videoTie
Released2026-01-272025-12-18—
Cited benchmark scores2616—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Kimi K2.5 and Seed1.8 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.