Compare / head-to-head
Kimi K2.7 CodevsNorth Mini Code
Kimi K2.7 Code and North Mini Code do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Both offer a 256K-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Moonshot AI · Cohere
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · released 2026-06-12
textvision
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 11 · 5 core
North Mini Code
Cohere · released 2026-06-09
text
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- 64K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 6 · 2 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 11 only Kimi K2.7 Code · 6 only North Mini Code| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | North Mini Code | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Kimi K2.7 Code reports · 11 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 12.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 54% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Kimi Claw 24/7 Bench | 46.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Kimi Code Bench v2 | 62% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MCP-Atlas | 76% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MCPMark-Verified | 81.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MLS-Bench-Lite | 35.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 95.6% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| ProgramBench | 53.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only North Mini Code reports · 6 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 67.6% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | not reported | 70.3% ↗ | — | — |
| SciCode | not reported | 38.2% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | not reported | 40.2% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | not reported | 31.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench v2 | not reported | 36% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Kimi K2.7 Code minus North Mini Code in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Kimi K2.7 Code | North Mini Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 256K tokens | Tie |
| Max output | — | 64K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Kimi K2.7 Code |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-06-09 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 11 | 6 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Kimi K2.7 Code vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
North Mini Code vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Kimi K2.7 Code and North Mini Code on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.