ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Kimi K2.7 CodevsQwen3.7-Flash

Kimi K2.7 Code leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.7-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Moonshot AI · Qwen
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · released 2026-06-12
textvision
Context
256K
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
11 · 5 core
Qwen3.7-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-07-15
textvision
Context
1M
Max out
Input /1M
$0.028
Output /1M
$0.11
Cached /1M
Scores
3 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7-FlashΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
GPQA Diamond87.9% epoch82.3% epoch+5.6 ptKimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)54% epoch19.3% epoch+34.7 ptKimi K2.7 Code
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)95.6% epoch86.7% epoch+8.9 ptKimi K2.7 Code
Only Kimi K2.7 Code reports · 8
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)12.2% epochnot reported
Kimi Claw 24/7 Bench46.9% not reported
Kimi Code Bench v262% not reported
MCP-Atlas76% not reported
MCPMark-Verified81.1% not reported
MLS-Bench-Lite35.1% not reported
ProgramBench53.6% not reported
SimpleQA Verified36.5% epochnot reported
Only Qwen3.7-Flash reports · 0
Qwen3.7-Flash reports nothing Kimi K2.7 Code does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Kimi K2.7 Code minus Qwen3.7-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecKimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7-FlashEdge
Context window256K tokens1M tokensQwen3.7-Flash
Max output
Input price / 1M$0.028
Output price / 1M$0.11
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.138
Modalitiestext · visiontext · visionTie
Released2026-06-122026-07-15
Cited benchmark scores113
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Kimi K2.7 Code vs …

More matchups

Qwen3.7-Flash vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3.7-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.