Compare / head-to-head
LongCat 2.0vsMAI-Thinking-1
LongCat 2.0 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
LongCat 2.0 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
LongCat 2.0
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Meituan LongCat · Microsoft
LongCat 2.0
Meituan LongCat · released 2026-06-30
text
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 10 · 4 core
MAI-Thinking-1
Microsoft · released 2026-08-12
text
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- 64K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 15 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 8 only LongCat 2.0 · 13 only MAI-Thinking-1| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | MAI-Thinking-1 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 88.9% ↗ | 84.2% ↗ | +4.7 pt | LongCat 2.0 |
| SWE-bench Pro | 59.5% ↗ | 52.8% ↗ | +6.7 pt | LongCat 2.0 |
| Only LongCat 2.0 reports · 8 | ||||
| BrowseComp | 79.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FORTE | 73.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 90% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IMO-AnswerBench | 81.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| RWSearch | 78.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 77.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Writing Bench | 83.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only MAI-Thinking-1 reports · 13 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 73.5% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 85% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 97% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 94.5% ↗ | — | — |
| AdvancedIF | not reported | 85% ↗ | — | — |
| BFCL v3 | not reported | 72% ↗ | — | — |
| GraphWalks (<=128K) | not reported | 90% ↗ | — | — |
| HMMT February 2026 | not reported | 84.9% ↗ | — | — |
| IFBench | not reported | 69% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | not reported | 87.7% ↗ | — | — |
| MultiChallenge | not reported | 53% ↗ | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 31% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | not reported | 46% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is LongCat 2.0 minus MAI-Thinking-1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | LongCat 2.0 | MAI-Thinking-1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 256K tokens | LongCat 2.0 |
| Max output | — | 64K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2026-06-30 | 2026-08-12 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 10 | 15 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
LongCat 2.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
MAI-Thinking-1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run LongCat 2.0 and MAI-Thinking-1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.