Compare / head-to-head
LongCat 2.0vsSolar Open 2 250B-A15B
LongCat 2.0 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
LongCat 2.0 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Meituan LongCat · Upstage
LongCat 2.0
Meituan LongCat · released 2026-06-30
text
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 10 · 4 core
Solar Open 2 250B-A15B
Upstage · released 2026-07-24
text
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 16 · 5 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 9 only LongCat 2.0 · 15 only Solar Open 2 250B-A15B| Benchmark | LongCat 2.0 | Solar Open 2 250B-A15B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 88.9% ↗ | 86.3% ↗ | +2.6 pt | LongCat 2.0 |
| Only LongCat 2.0 reports · 9 | ||||
| BrowseComp | 79.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FORTE | 73.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 90% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IMO-AnswerBench | 81.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| RWSearch | 78.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 77.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 59.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Writing Bench | 83.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Solar Open 2 250B-A15B reports · 15 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 70.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 86.2% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 95.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 28.8% ↗ | — | — |
| AA-LCR | not reported | 62.3% ↗ | — | — |
| APEX-Agents | not reported | 16.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ArtifactsBench | not reported | 55.9% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | not reported | 1128 ↗ | — | — |
| HMMT 2026-02 | not reported | 93.9% ↗ | — | — |
| IFBench | not reported | 80% ↗ | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | not reported | 92.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | not reported | 58.2% ↗ | — | — |
| Multi-Challenge | not reported | 61% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau3-Bench (banking) | not reported | 19.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal Bench Hard | not reported | 28.3% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is LongCat 2.0 minus Solar Open 2 250B-A15B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | LongCat 2.0 | Solar Open 2 250B-A15B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2026-06-30 | 2026-07-24 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 10 | 16 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
LongCat 2.0 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Solar Open 2 250B-A15B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run LongCat 2.0 and Solar Open 2 250B-A15B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.