ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

MiMo-V2.5-ProvsQwen3.8 27B

MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
unknown
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Xiaomi MiMo · Qwen
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi MiMo
text
Context
Max out
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen · released 2026-08-14
textvision
Context
262K
Max out
Input /1M
$0.424
Output /1M
$1.7
Cached /1M
Scores
4 · 3 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3.8 27BΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1464.7 1439.3 +25.4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports · 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reports nothing Qwen3.8 27B does not.
Only Qwen3.8 27B reports · 3
GPQA Diamondnot reported89.2%
SWE-Bench Pronot reported61.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported73%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiMo-V2.5-Pro minus Qwen3.8 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMiMo-V2.5-ProQwen3.8 27BEdge
Context window262K tokens
Max output
Input price / 1M$0.424
Output price / 1M$1.7
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.12
Modalitiestexttext · visionQwen3.8 27B
Released2026-08-14
Cited benchmark scores14
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs …

More matchups

Qwen3.8 27B vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.8 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.