Compare / head-to-head
MiMo-V2.5vsPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct
MiMo-V2.5 and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct split their 5 shared benchmarks evenly. MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 0
even split
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
MiMo-V2.5
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Xiaomi MiMo · Microsoft
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi MiMo
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 7 · 1 core
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Microsoft · released 2025-02-26
textvisionaudio
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 4K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 19 · 0 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
5 shared · 2 only MiMo-V2.5 · 14 only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 5 | ||||
| ChartQA | 81.4% ↗ | 81.4% ↗ | 0 | Tie |
| DocVQA | 93.2% ↗ | 93.2% ↗ | 0 | Tie |
| InfoVQA | 72.7% ↗ | 72.7% ↗ | 0 | Tie |
| MMMU | 55.1% ↗ | 55.1% ↗ | 0 | Tie |
| ScienceQA Visual | 97.5% ↗ | 97.5% ↗ | 0 | Tie |
| Only MiMo-V2.5 reports · 2 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1427.4 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 38.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct reports · 14 | ||||
| AI2D | not reported | 82.3% ↗ | — | — |
| BLINK | not reported | 61.3% ↗ | — | — |
| InterGPS | not reported | 48.6% ↗ | — | — |
| MathVista testmini | not reported | 62.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MMBench (dev-en) | not reported | 86.7% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (standard/vision) | not reported | 38.5% ↗ | — | — |
| OCRBench | not reported | 84.4% ↗ | — | — |
| POPE | not reported | 85.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech AI2D | not reported | 68.9% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech ChartQA | not reported | 69% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech DocVQA | not reported | 87.3% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech InfoVQA | not reported | 63.7% ↗ | — | — |
| TextVQA (val) | not reported | 75.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Video-MME (16 frames) | not reported | 55% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiMo-V2.5 minus Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 128K tokens | MiMo-V2.5 |
| Max output | — | 4K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision · audio | Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct |
| Released | — | 2025-02-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 19 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
MiMo-V2.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiMo-V2.5 and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.