Compare / head-to-head
MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27B leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. MiniMax M2.7 is 1.4x cheaper per token. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Qwen3.8 27B leads
Cheaper per token
MiniMax M2.7
1.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.8 27B
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
MiniMax · Qwen
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · released 2026-03-18
text
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen · released 2026-08-14
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 0 only MiniMax M2.7 · 3 only Qwen3.8 27B| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.8 27B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1404.6 ↗ | 1439.3 ↗ | -34.7 | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Only MiniMax M2.7 reports · 0 | ||||
| MiniMax M2.7 reports nothing Qwen3.8 27B does not. | ||||
| Only Qwen3.8 27B reports · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 89.2% ↗ | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 61.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | not reported | 73% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiniMax M2.7 minus Qwen3.8 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | MiniMax M2.7 | Qwen3.8 27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 205K tokens | 262K tokens | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.3 ↗ | $0.424 ↗ | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.2 ↗ | $1.7 ↗ | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.06 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $1.5 | $2.12 | MiniMax M2.7 |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Qwen3.8 27B |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-08-14 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
MiniMax M2.7 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.8 27B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3.8 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.