Compare / head-to-head
Phi-4vsQwen3-Coder-Plus
Phi-4 and Qwen3-Coder-Plus do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Qwen3-Coder-Plus has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3-Coder-Plus
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Microsoft · Qwen
Phi-4
Microsoft · released 2024-12-12
text
- Context
- 16K
- Max out
- 16K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 11 · 7 core
Qwen3-Coder-Plus
Qwen · released 2025-07-22
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 10 only Phi-4 · 1 only Qwen3-Coder-Plus| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-Coder-Plus | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Phi-4 reports · 10 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU | 84.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 70.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval | 82.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1216.6 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ArenaHard | 75.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| IFEval | 63% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MATH | 80.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 13.8% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3-Coder-Plus reports · 1 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 69.6% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Phi-4 minus Qwen3-Coder-Plus in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Phi-4 | Qwen3-Coder-Plus | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 16K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3-Coder-Plus |
| Max output | 16K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.574 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $2.29 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.057 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $2.87 | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2024-12-12 | 2025-07-22 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 11 | 1 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Phi-4 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3-Coder-Plus vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Phi-4 and Qwen3-Coder-Plus on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.