Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507vsQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking leads 5 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 is 1.7x cheaper per token. Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 5
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
1.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-31
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$2.4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
18 · 7 core
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Qwen · released 2025-09-23
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.4 ↗
Output /1M
$4 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingΔEdge
Reported by both · 6
MMLU-Pro80.9% ↗83.8% ↗-2.9 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
AIME2585% ↗89.7% ↗-4.7 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
HMMT2571.4% ↗77.4% ↗-6 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
IFEval88.9% ↗88.2% ↗+0.7 ptQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Redux91.4% ↗93.7% ↗-2.3 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
SuperGPQA56.8% ↗64.3% ↗-7.5 ptQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Only Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 reports · 12
GPQA Diamond70.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Arena-Hard v256% ↗not reported——
BFCL-v372.4% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GPQA73.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench 2024112576.8% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)66% ↗not reported——
OJBench25.1% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)70.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
TAU2-Airline58% ↗not reported——
TAU2-Retail58.8% ↗not reported——
TAU2-Telecom26.3% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking reports · 11
LMArena Elonot reported1395 ↗——
BFCLnot reported71.9% ↗——
HLEnot reported13.6% ↗——
LCB v6not reported70.1% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1188 ↗——
MathVista (mini)not reported85.8% ↗——
MMMU (val)not reported80.6% ↗——
MMMU_Pronot reported69.3% ↗——
OSWorldnot reported38.1% ↗——
SimpleQAnot reported44.4% ↗——
VideoMME (w/o sub)not reported79% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 minus Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B ThinkingEdge
Context window262K tokens256K tokensQwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.2 ↗$0.4 ↗Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Output price / 1M$2.4 ↗$4 ↗Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.6$4.4Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507
Modalitiestexttext · vision · videoQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking
Released2025-07-312025-09-23—
Cited benchmark scores1817—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 30B-A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Thinking on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.