Compare / head-to-head
Claude Fable 5.1vsGPT-5.4 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Claude Fable 5.1 is 3.5x cheaper per token. GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
Claude Fable 5.1
3.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.4 Pro
1.1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 95.2096%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · released 2026-09-01
textvision
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI · released 2026-03-05
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 4 only Claude Fable 5.1 · 8 only GPT-5.4 Pro| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.4 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 60.9% ↗ | 42.7% ↗ | +18.2 pt | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 87.8% ↗epoch | 58.5% ↗epoch | +29.3 pt | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 90.2% ↗epoch | 82.5% ↗epoch | +7.7 pt | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% ↗epoch | 46.3% ↗epoch | +24.5 pt | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Only Claude Fable 5.1 reports · 4 | ||||
| CursorBench 3.2.0 | 73.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1853 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 100% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 | 52.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.4 Pro reports · 8 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 94.4% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 94.5% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 83.3% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 89.3% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | not reported | 50% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | not reported | 38% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 82% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 58.7% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Fable 5.1 minus GPT-5.4 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Fable 5.1 | GPT-5.4 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.1M tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens | Tie |
| Input price / 1M | $10 ↗ | $30 ↗ | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Output price / 1M | $50 ↗ | $180 ↗ | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.25 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $60 | $210 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-03-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 13 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Fable 5.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.4 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-5.4 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.