Compare / head-to-head
CodestralvsGPT-4.1
Codestral and GPT-4.1 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Codestral is 8.3x cheaper per token. GPT-4.1 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Codestral
8.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-4.1
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 95.122%
Mistral AI · OpenAI
Codestral
Mistral AI · released 2025-01-13
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 1 only Codestral · 9 only GPT-4.1| Benchmark | Codestral | GPT-4.1 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Codestral reports · 1 | ||||
| HumanEval | 86.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-4.1 reports · 9 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 54.6% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 66.3% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU | not reported | 90.2% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | not reported | 48.1% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 6% ↗epoch | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 38.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 31.1% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 48.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Video-MME (long, no subtitles) | not reported | 72% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Codestral minus GPT-4.1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Codestral | GPT-4.1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 1.0M tokens | GPT-4.1 |
| Max output | — | 33K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.3 ↗ | $2 ↗ | Codestral |
| Output price / 1M | $0.9 ↗ | $8 ↗ | Codestral |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 ↗ | $0.5 ↗ | Codestral |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $1.2 | $10 | Codestral |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | GPT-4.1 |
| Released | 2025-01-13 | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 10 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Codestral vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-4.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Codestral and GPT-4.1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.