Compare / head-to-head
Command A VisionvsDeepSeek R1
Command A Vision and DeepSeek R1 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Both offer a 128K-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Cohere · DeepSeek
Command A Vision
Cohere · released 2025-07-31
textvision
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 8K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 0 · 0 core
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek · released 2025-01-20
text
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 33K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 8 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 0 only Command A Vision · 7 only DeepSeek R1| Benchmark | Command A Vision | DeepSeek R1 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command A Vision reports · 0 | ||||
| Command A Vision reports nothing DeepSeek R1 does not. | ||||
| Only DeepSeek R1 reports · 7 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 49.2% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 71.5% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU | not reported | 90.8% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 84% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 70% ↗matharena | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | not reported | 1372.6 ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 53.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command A Vision minus DeepSeek R1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command A Vision | DeepSeek R1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 128K tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 8K tokens | 33K tokens | DeepSeek R1 |
| Input price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | Command A Vision |
| Released | 2025-07-31 | 2025-01-20 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 0 | 8 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
DeepSeek R1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command A Vision and DeepSeek R1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.