Compare / head-to-head
Command R+vsGPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Command R+ is 2.8x cheaper per token. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GPT-5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
Command R+
2.8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.5
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 94.386%
Cohere · OpenAI
Command R+
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 0 only Command R+ · 20 only GPT-5.5| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-5.5 | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1203.7 ↗ | 1465.6 ↗ | -261.9 | GPT-5.5 |
| Only Command R+ reports · 0 | ||||
| Command R+ reports nothing GPT-5.5 does not. | ||||
| Only GPT-5.5 reports · 20 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 90.7% ↗epoch | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 95% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 85% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 84.4% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | not reported | 51.7% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | not reported | 35.4% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 72.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 85.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 84.9% ↗ | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | not reported | 75.3% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | not reported | 81.2% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | not reported | 83.2% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | not reported | 78.7% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 84.4% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 63% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | not reported | 58.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | not reported | 98% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | not reported | 82.7% ↗ | — | — |
| Toolathlon | not reported | 55.6% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R+ minus GPT-5.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R+ | GPT-5.5 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens | GPT-5.5 |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.5 |
| Input price / 1M | $2.5 ↗ | $5 ↗ | Command R+ |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | $30 ↗ | Command R+ |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.5 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $12.5 | $35 | Command R+ |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | GPT-5.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 21 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R+ vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R+ and GPT-5.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.