Compare / head-to-head
DeepSeek V3.2vsQwen3-Max
DeepSeek V3.2 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3-Max has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
DeepSeek V3.2 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3-Max
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
DeepSeek · Qwen
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · released 2025-12-01
text
- Context
- 131K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 8 · 7 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 5 only DeepSeek V3.2 · 3 only Qwen3-Max| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Qwen3-Max | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.1% ↗ | 69.6% ↗ | +3.5 pt | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.4% ↗ | 72.6% ↗epoch | +9.8 pt | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Only DeepSeek V3.2 reports · 5 | ||||
| MMLU-Pro | 85% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2025 | 93.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 94.2% ↗matharena | not reported | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | 25.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1424.8 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3-Max reports · 3 | ||||
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 18.9% ↗epoch | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 73.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 48.7% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is DeepSeek V3.2 minus Qwen3-Max in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Qwen3-Max | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131K tokens | 262K tokens | Qwen3-Max |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $1.2 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $6 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.12 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $7.2 | — |
| Modalities | text | text | Tie |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-09-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 8 | 5 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
DeepSeek V3.2 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3-Max vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3-Max on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.