Compare / head-to-head
Dola Seed 2.1 TurbovsPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo has the larger context window (256K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo
256K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
ByteDance Seed · Microsoft
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance Seed · released 2026-07-13
textvisionvideo
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Microsoft · released 2025-02-26
textvisionaudio
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 4K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 19 · 0 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 26 only Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo · 19 only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct| Benchmark | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo | Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo reports · 26 | ||||
| Agent Startup Bench | 54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BabyVision | 62.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| BeyondAIME | 88% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv-RQ | 82.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CharXiv-RQ (with tools) | 83.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ERQA | 71.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| KINA | 46.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MathVision | 90.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MathVision (with tools) | 92.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Minerva Video Reasoning | 65.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLongBench 128K | 76.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 80.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 82.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| NL2Repo-Bench | 43.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OVOBench | 79.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SuperGPQA | 67.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Atlas | 30.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 67.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| TOMATO | 56.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| VideoMME | 89% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| VideoSimpleQA | 71.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Workspace Bench | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| WorldVQA | 48.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| xDailyBench | 56.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZEROBench | 11% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ZEROBench (with tools) | 20% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct reports · 19 | ||||
| AI2D | not reported | 82.3% ↗ | — | — |
| BLINK | not reported | 61.3% ↗ | — | — |
| ChartQA | not reported | 81.4% ↗ | — | — |
| DocVQA | not reported | 93.2% ↗ | — | — |
| InfoVQA | not reported | 72.7% ↗ | — | — |
| InterGPS | not reported | 48.6% ↗ | — | — |
| MathVista testmini | not reported | 62.4% ↗ | — | — |
| MMBench (dev-en) | not reported | 86.7% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU | not reported | 55.1% ↗ | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (standard/vision) | not reported | 38.5% ↗ | — | — |
| OCRBench | not reported | 84.4% ↗ | — | — |
| POPE | not reported | 85.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ScienceQA Visual | not reported | 97.5% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech AI2D | not reported | 68.9% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech ChartQA | not reported | 69% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech DocVQA | not reported | 87.3% ↗ | — | — |
| Speech InfoVQA | not reported | 63.7% ↗ | — | — |
| TextVQA (val) | not reported | 75.6% ↗ | — | — |
| Video-MME (16 frames) | not reported | 55% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo minus Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo | Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 256K tokens | 128K tokens | Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo |
| Max output | — | 4K tokens | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $2.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.1 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $3 | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision · video | text · vision · audio | Tie |
| Released | 2026-07-13 | 2025-02-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 26 | 19 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Dola Seed 2.1 Turbo and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.