Compare / head-to-head
ERNIE 5.1vsQwen3.5 27B
ERNIE 5.1 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Qwen3.5 27B has the larger context window (262K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
ERNIE 5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.5 27B
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Baidu · Qwen
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
- Context
- 128K
- Max out
- 66K
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 2 · 2 core
Qwen3.5 27B
Qwen
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 1 only ERNIE 5.1 · 4 only Qwen3.5 27B| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.5 27B | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1468.2 ↗ | 1408.1 ↗ | +60.1 | ERNIE 5.1 |
| Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 1 | ||||
| AIME 2026 (with tools) | 99.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.5 27B reports · 4 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 75% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 85.5% ↗ | — | — |
| MMLU-Pro | not reported | 86.1% ↗ | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | not reported | 91.7% ↗matharena ⚠ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is ERNIE 5.1 minus Qwen3.5 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.5 27B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 262K tokens | Qwen3.5 27B |
| Max output | 66K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.086 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $0.688 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $0.774 | — |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Qwen3.5 27B |
| Released | 2026-05-09 | — | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 2 | 5 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
ERNIE 5.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.5 27B vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.5 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.