Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsInkling-Small

Gemini 4 Argon leads 5 of 5 shared benchmarks. Inkling-Small is 8x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
5 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Inkling-Small
8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Thinking Machines Lab
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab · released 2026-07-30
textvisionaudio
Context
1M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.3 ↗
Output /1M
$1.2 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.06
Scores
29 · 12 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonInkling-SmallΔEdge
Reported by both · 5
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1405.2 ↗+120Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗-0.1033 ↗+0.2Gemini 4 Argon
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗1408.2 ↗+271.3Gemini 4 Argon
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗32.7% ↗+20.9 ptGemini 4 Argon
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗0% ↗+57.6 ptGemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 7
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗not reported——
Only Inkling-Small reports · 23
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported80.2% ↗——
GPQA Diamondnot reported88.5% ↗epoch run——
AIME 2026not reported95.5% ↗——
ARC-AGI-1not reported84% ↗——
ARC-AGI-2not reported40.1% ↗——
BrowseComp (with context management)not reported77.4% ↗——
CharXiv RQnot reported77.4% ↗——
CharXiv RQ (with python)not reported81.3% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported18% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported17.1% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
HMMT Feb 2026not reported90.2% ↗——
IFBenchnot reported82.2% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1206.3 ↗——
MCP Atlas (all)not reported79.2% ↗——
MMAUnot reported77% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported6% ↗epoch run——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported90% ↗epoch run——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported20.6% ↗——
SWE-bench Pro (public)not reported55.9% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (best harness)not reported64.7% ↗——
Toolathlon Verifiednot reported54.4% ↗——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported54.4% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Inkling-Small in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonInkling-SmallEdge
Context window—1M tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.3 ↗Inkling-Small
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$1.2 ↗Inkling-Small
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.06 ↗Inkling-Small
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$1.5Inkling-Small
Modalitiestext · vision · videotext · vision · audioTie
Released2026-09-302026-07-30—
Cited benchmark scores1229—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

More matchups

Inkling-Small vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Inkling-Small on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.