Compare / head-to-head
GLM-4.7-FlashvsGPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GPT-5 Pro has the larger context window (400K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GPT-5 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.7-Flash
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5 Pro
400K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 94.2446%
Z.ai · OpenAI
GLM-4.7-Flash
Z.ai
text
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 2 only GLM-4.7-Flash · 2 only GPT-5 Pro| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | GPT-5 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% ↗epoch | 88.4% ↗ | -27.9 pt | GPT-5 Pro |
| Only GLM-4.7-Flash reports · 2 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1352.2 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 58.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5 Pro reports · 2 | ||||
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 19.5% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 55.8% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-4.7-Flash minus GPT-5 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-4.7-Flash | GPT-5 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 400K tokens | GPT-5 Pro |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 272K tokens | GPT-5 Pro |
| Input price / 1M | $0 ↗ | $15 ↗ | GLM-4.7-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $0 ↗ | $120 ↗ | GLM-4.7-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $0 | $135 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | GPT-5 Pro |
| Released | — | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 3 | 3 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-4.7-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-4.7-Flash and GPT-5 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.