ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GLM-5.1vsQwen3.5 27B

GLM-5.1 leads 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5 27B is 7.5x cheaper per token. Qwen3.5 27B has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 0
GLM-5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.5 27B
7.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.5 27B
262K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Qwen
GLM-5.1
Z.ai · released 2026-04-07
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$1.4
Output /1M
$4.4
Cached /1M
$0.26
Scores
7 · 7 core
textvision
Context
262K
Max out
Input /1M
$0.086
Output /1M
$0.688
Cached /1M
Scores
5 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGLM-5.1Qwen3.5 27BΔEdge
Reported by both · 3
GPQA Diamond89.9% epoch85.5% +4.4 ptGLM-5.1
AIME 202695.8% matharena91.7% matharena+4.1 ptGLM-5.1
LMArena Elo1462.4 1408.1 +54.3GLM-5.1
Only GLM-5.1 reports · 4
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)36.8% epochnot reported
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)93.3% epochnot reported
SimpleQA Verified34% epochnot reported
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)74.2% epochnot reported
Only Qwen3.5 27B reports · 2
SWE-bench Verifiednot reported75%
MMLU-Pronot reported86.1%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.1 minus Qwen3.5 27B in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGLM-5.1Qwen3.5 27BEdge
Context window200K tokens262K tokensQwen3.5 27B
Max output131K tokens
Input price / 1M$1.4 $0.086 Qwen3.5 27B
Output price / 1M$4.4 $0.688 Qwen3.5 27B
Cached input / 1M$0.26
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$5.8$0.774Qwen3.5 27B
Modalitiestexttext · visionQwen3.5 27B
Released2026-04-07
Cited benchmark scores75
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

GLM-5.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.1 and Qwen3.5 27B on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.