Compare / head-to-head
GLM-5.2vsQwen3.6-Flash
GLM-5.2 leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.6-Flash is 5x cheaper per token. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
4 – 0
GLM-5.2 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.6-Flash
5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Z.ai · Qwen
GLM-5.2
Z.ai · released 2026-06-24
text
Qwen3.6-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 21 only GLM-5.2 · 0 only Qwen3.6-Flash| Benchmark | GLM-5.2 | Qwen3.6-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 91.9% ↗epoch | 83.3% ↗epoch | +8.6 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 59.2% ↗epoch | 17.2% ↗epoch | +42 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 86.4% ↗epoch | 84.4% ↗epoch | +2 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.2% ↗epoch | 15.9% ↗epoch | +18.3 pt | GLM-5.2 |
| Only GLM-5.2 reports · 21 | ||||
| AIME 2026 | 90% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI) | 23.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AutomationBench v1.0.6 | 26.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CyberGym | 77.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 46.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitBench | 24.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 2h | 29 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 6h | 39 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 29.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierSWE | 67.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1508 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HLE (with tools) | 54.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| NL2Repo | 48.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| PostTrainBench | 31.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ProgramBench (Almost Solved) | 9.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 62.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 78.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Marathon v1.1 | 19.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 81% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 4.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon Verified | 59.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.6-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.6-Flash reports nothing GLM-5.2 does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.2 minus Qwen3.6-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-5.2 | Qwen3.6-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | 131K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $1.4 ↗ | $0.165 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $4.4 ↗ | $0.99 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.26 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $5.8 | $1.16 | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Released | 2026-06-24 | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 26 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-5.2 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.6-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.2 and Qwen3.6-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.