Compare / head-to-head
GLM-5.3vsGPT-5.4 Pro
GPT-5.4 Pro leads 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3 is 36.2x cheaper per token. GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 4
GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-5.3
36.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.4 Pro
1.1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · 94.2446%
Z.ai · OpenAI
GLM-5.3
Z.ai · released 2026-08-14
text
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI · released 2026-03-05
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 20 only GLM-5.3 · 8 only GPT-5.4 Pro| Benchmark | GLM-5.3 | GPT-5.4 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% ↗epoch | 94.4% ↗ | -3.5 pt | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 29.3% ↗epoch | 58.5% ↗epoch | -29.2 pt | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 68.8% ↗epoch | 82.5% ↗epoch | -13.7 pt | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41% ↗epoch | 46.3% ↗epoch | -5.3 pt | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Only GLM-5.3 reports · 20 | ||||
| Agents' Last Exam | 28.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Agents' Last Exam (ALE-CLI) | 28.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AutomationBench v1.0.6 | 48.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| CyberGym | 84.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 66.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitBench | 54.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 2h | 105 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ExploitGym 6h | 130 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierSWE | 78.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1769 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HLE (with tools) | 62.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| NL2Repo | 58% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 91.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| PostTrainBench | 39.8% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ProgramBench (Almost Solved) | 19% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Marathon v1.1 | 42.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 88.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 3.0 | 28.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon Verified | 73% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Z.ai Code Bench (max effort) | 34.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.4 Pro reports · 8 | ||||
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 42.7% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 94.5% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 83.3% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 89.3% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | not reported | 50% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | not reported | 38% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 82% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 58.7% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GLM-5.3 minus GPT-5.4 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GLM-5.3 | GPT-5.4 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1.1M tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Max output | 131K tokens | 128K tokens | GLM-5.3 |
| Input price / 1M | $1.4 ↗ | $30 ↗ | GLM-5.3 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.4 ↗ | $180 ↗ | GLM-5.3 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.26 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $5.8 | $210 | GLM-5.3 |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Released | 2026-08-14 | 2026-03-05 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 33 | 13 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GLM-5.3 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.4 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GLM-5.3 and GPT-5.4 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.