ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

GPT-4.1 nanovsPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct

GPT-4.1 nano and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-4.1 nano
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
95.2522% · —
OpenAI · Microsoft
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI · released 2025-04-14
textvision
Context
1.0M
Max out
33K
Input /1M
$0.1
Output /1M
$0.4
Cached /1M
$0.025
Scores
7 · 5 core
Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Microsoft · released 2025-02-26
textvisionaudio
Context
128K
Max out
4K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
19 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoPhi-4 Multimodal InstructΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only GPT-4.1 nano reports · 6
GPQA Diamond50.3% not reported
MMLU80.1% not reported
Aider Polyglot9.8% not reported
AIME 202429.4% not reported
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)28.9% epochnot reported
SimpleQA Verified6% epochnot reported
Only Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct reports · 19
AI2Dnot reported82.3%
BLINKnot reported61.3%
ChartQAnot reported81.4%
DocVQAnot reported93.2%
InfoVQAnot reported72.7%
InterGPSnot reported48.6%
MathVista testmininot reported62.4%
MMBench (dev-en)not reported86.7%
MMMUnot reported55.1%
MMMU-Pro (standard/vision)not reported38.5%
OCRBenchnot reported84.4%
POPEnot reported85.6%
ScienceQA Visualnot reported97.5%
Speech AI2Dnot reported68.9%
Speech ChartQAnot reported69%
Speech DocVQAnot reported87.3%
Speech InfoVQAnot reported63.7%
TextVQA (val)not reported75.6%
Video-MME (16 frames)not reported55%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-4.1 nano minus Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-4.1 nanoPhi-4 Multimodal InstructEdge
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokensGPT-4.1 nano
Max output33K tokens4K tokensGPT-4.1 nano
Input price / 1M$0.1
Output price / 1M$0.4
Cached input / 1M$0.025
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.5
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · audioPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct
Released2025-04-142025-02-26
Cited benchmark scores719
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

GPT-4.1 nano vs …

More matchups

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-4.1 nano and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.