Compare / head-to-head

GPT-5.2-CodexvsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 7 of 8 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.3 is 2.9x cheaper per token. Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 7
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
Muse Spark 1.3
2.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.3
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Meta
GPT-5.2-Codex
OpenAI · released 2025-12-18
textvision
Context
400K
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$1.75 ↗
Output /1M
$14 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.175
Scores
13 · 2 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMuse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 8
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)49.4% ↗64.1% ↗-14.7 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)83.6% ↗81.1% ↗+2.5 ptGPT-5.2-Codex
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)78.2% ↗79.6% ↗-1.4 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)66.4% ↗78% ↗-11.6 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.7% ↗82.8% ↗-9.1 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)88.8% ↗95.9% ↗-7.1 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)77.7% ↗89.7% ↗-12 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1338.9 ↗1656.6 ↗-317.7Muse Spark 1.3
Only GPT-5.2-Codex reports · 5
Cybersecurity Capture The Flag Challenges67.4% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified38.2% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro56.4% ↗not reported——
SWE-Lancer IC Diamond76% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.064% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 21
LMArena Elonot reported1494.3 ↗——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported57.8% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported38% ↗epoch run——
DeepSearchQAnot reported90.3% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported75.4% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.04 ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1290.2 ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported99.2% ↗epoch run——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported24.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.2-Codex minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-5.2-CodexMuse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window400K tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.3
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$1.75 ↗$1.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Output price / 1M$14 ↗$4.25 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Cached input / 1M$0.175 ↗$0.15 ↗Muse Spark 1.3
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$15.75$5.5Muse Spark 1.3
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.3
Released2025-12-182026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores1329—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-5.2-Codex vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.2-Codex and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.