Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5.5vs
Hy3 preview
GPT-5.5 leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
GPT-5.5 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.5
1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Tencent Hunyuan
GPT-5.5
OpenAI · released 2026-04-23
textvision
Hy3 preview
Tencent Hunyuan · released 2026-04-23
text
- Context
- 256K
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 15 · 3 core
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 42 only GPT-5.5 · 13 only Hy3 preview| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Hy3 preview | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| BrowseComp | 84.4% ↗ | 67.1% ↗ | +17.3 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 82.7% ↗ | 54.4% ↗ | +28.3 pt | GPT-5.5 |
| Only GPT-5.5 reports · 42 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 90.7% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2026 | 100% ↗matharena ⚠ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Elo | 1465.6 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| APEX-Agents (Mercor) | 55.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | 95% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | 85% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 26% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve) | 67% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| EBR-bench (Epoch AI run) | 34.3% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 1-3 | 51.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 35.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 72.5% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 85.3% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run) | 44.2% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | 84.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GSO Opt@1 (GSO) | 37.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench) | 54% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Coding (LiveBench) | 82.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench) | 81.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench) | 70.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Language (LiveBench) | 87.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench) | 95.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench) | 89.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Agent (LMArena) | 0.0415 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LMArena Vision (LMArena) | 1286.5 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MCP Atlas | 75.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MirrorCode (Epoch AI run) | 10% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (no tools) | 81.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools) | 83.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run) | 56% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 78.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 84.4% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 51.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleBench (SimpleBench) | 69% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 63% ↗epoch run | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 58.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| tau2-bench Banking Knowledge (Sierra) | 44.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Tau2-bench Telecom | 98% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon | 55.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST) | 73.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs) | 7523.84 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle) | 84.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Hy3 preview reports · 13 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | not reported | 74.4% ↗ | — | — |
| AdvancedIF (CIF&CC subsets) | not reported | 79.5% ↗ | — | — |
| CHSBO 2025 (text-only, pass^3) | not reported | 87.8% ↗ | — | — |
| CL-bench | not reported | 22.8% ↗ | — | — |
| CL-bench Life | not reported | 15.7% ↗ | — | — |
| ClawEval (pass^3) | not reported | 55% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierScience Olympiad | not reported | 70% ↗ | — | — |
| GPQA-Diamond | not reported | 87.2% ↗ | — | — |
| HLE (text-only) | not reported | 30% ↗ | — | — |
| IMO Answer Bench | not reported | 84.3% ↗ | — | — |
| LongBench v2 | not reported | 65.4% ↗ | — | — |
| WideSearch | not reported | 70.2% ↗ | — | — |
| WildClawBench (text-only) | not reported | 45.3% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.5 minus Hy3 preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5.5 | Hy3 preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 256K tokens | GPT-5.5 |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $5 ↗ | — | — |
| Output price / 1M | $30 ↗ | — | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $35 | — | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text | GPT-5.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 50 | 15 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Live from /statusMore matchups
GPT-5.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Hy3 preview vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.5 and Hy3 preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.