Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsQwen3.6-Max-Preview

GPT-6 Luna leads 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. GPT-6 Luna is 15.2x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
4 – 3
GPT-6 Luna leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
15.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Qwen · released 2026-04-18
text
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.3 ↗
Output /1M
$7.8 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 8 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3.6-Max-PreviewΔEdge
Reported by both · 7
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch run87.4% ↗epoch run+3.1 ptGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗1460.3 ↗-17.4Qwen3.6-Max-Preview
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch run20% ↗epoch run+11 ptGPT-6 Luna
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗1481.5 ↗+97.2GPT-6 Luna
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch run19% ↗epoch run-12 ptQwen3.6-Max-Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch run91.1% ↗epoch run+7.8 ptGPT-6 Luna
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch run52% ↗epoch run-10.6 ptQwen3.6-Max-Preview
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 15
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3.6-Max-Preview reports · 10
NL2Reponot reported42.9% ↗——
QwenClawBenchnot reported59% ↗——
SciCodenot reported47% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported63% ↗——
SkillsBenchnot reported55.6% ↗——
SuperGPQAnot reported73.9% ↗——
SWE-bench Pronot reported57.3% ↗——
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run)not reported76.7% ↗epoch run——
Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Terminus-2)not reported65.4% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported4254.19 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Qwen3.6-Max-Preview in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaQwen3.6-Max-PreviewEdge
Context window1.1M tokens256K tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$1.3 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$7.8 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$9.1GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6 Luna
Released2026-09-222026-04-18—
Cited benchmark scores2217—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

More matchups

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.6-Max-Preview on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.