Compare / head-to-head

GPT-6 LunavsSolar Pro 3

GPT-6 Luna and Solar Pro 3 do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. GPT-6 Luna is 1.3x cheaper per token. GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
GPT-6 Luna
1.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-6 Luna
1.1M tokens
Providers
2 providers
OpenAI · Upstage
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI · released 2026-09-22
textvision
Context
1.1M
Max out
128K
Input /1M
$0.1 ↗
Output /1M
$0.5 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.01
Scores
22 · 8 core
Solar Pro 3
Upstage · released 2026-01-26
text
Context
128K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.15 ↗
Output /1M
$0.6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.015
Scores
12 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSolar Pro 3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 0
No public benchmark is reported for both models yet.
Only GPT-6 Luna reports · 22
GPQA Diamond90.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LMArena Elo1442.9 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)44.3% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)31% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSWE v1.166.6% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)56.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)78.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)44.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)51.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)79% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)55.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)73.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)89.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)81.8% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0135 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1578.7 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified41.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)13.6% ↗not reported——
Only Solar Pro 3 reports · 12
AIME'26not reported83% ↗——
Arena-hard-v2not reported74.7% ↗——
GPQA-Diamondnot reported71.92% ↗——
HLEnot reported11.91% ↗——
HMMT'26not reported65.91% ↗——
IFBenchnot reported73.13% ↗——
Ko-Arena-hard-v2not reported78.2% ↗——
LCB.v1-6not reported77.73% ↗——
MMLU PRO (0shot, cot)not reported81.24% ↗——
SWE Benchnot reported28.57% ↗——
Tau2-allnot reported72.34% ↗——
Terminal Bench 2not reported10.11% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-6 Luna minus Solar Pro 3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGPT-6 LunaSolar Pro 3Edge
Context window1.1M tokens128K tokensGPT-6 Luna
Max output128K tokens——
Input price / 1M$0.1 ↗$0.15 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Output price / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.6 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Cached input / 1M$0.01 ↗$0.015 ↗GPT-6 Luna
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$0.6$0.75GPT-6 Luna
Modalitiestext · visiontextGPT-6 Luna
Released2026-09-222026-01-26—
Cited benchmark scores2212—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

GPT-6 Luna vs …

More matchups

Solar Pro 3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-6 Luna and Solar Pro 3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.