Compare / head-to-head

Grok 4.7vsMercury 2.5

Grok 4.7 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Mercury 2.5 is 8.4x cheaper per token. Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Grok 4.7 leads
Cheaper per token
Mercury 2.5
8.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Grok 4.7
500K tokens
Providers
2 providers
xAI · Inception
Grok 4.7
xAI · released 2026-09-21
textvision
Context
500K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
30 · 8 core
Mercury 2.5
Inception · released 2026-09-08
text
Context
260K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.02
Scores
1 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Mercury 2.5ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)28.8% ↗0% ↗+28.8 ptGrok 4.7
Only Grok 4.7 reports · 29
GPQA Diamond92.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LMArena Elo1442.5 ↗not reported——
AA Briefcase v1.11657 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)54.6% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)38% ↗epoch runnot reported——
CursorBench 4.046.3% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.171% ↗not reported——
EEBench64% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)17.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)53% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)29.5% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)20.8% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark19.6% ↗not reported——
HealthBench Professional56.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)54% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)77.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)76.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)75.3% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)80.1% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)95.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)82.7% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0404 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1637.5 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)29% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)40.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified56% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.038% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)10536.83 ↗not reported——
Only Mercury 2.5 reports · 0
Mercury 2.5 reports nothing Grok 4.7 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4.7 minus Mercury 2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok 4.7Mercury 2.5Edge
Context window500K tokens260K tokensGrok 4.7
Max output—66K tokens—
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.2 ↗Mercury 2.5
Output price / 1M$6 ↗$0.75 ↗Mercury 2.5
Cached input / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.02 ↗Mercury 2.5
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$8$0.95Mercury 2.5
Modalitiestext · visiontextGrok 4.7
Released2026-09-212026-09-08—
Cited benchmark scores301—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Grok 4.7 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.