Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 3.8 FlashvsMercury 2.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Mercury 2.5 is 4.7x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Gemini 3.8 Flash leads
Cheaper per token
Mercury 2.5
4.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.8 Flash
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Google · Inception
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google · released 2026-09-02
textvisionaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.75 ↗
Output /1M
$3.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.075
Scores
43 · 10 core
Mercury 2.5
Inception · released 2026-09-08
text
Context
260K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.02
Scores
1 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2.5ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)19.2% ↗0% ↗+19.2 ptGemini 3.8 Flash
Only Gemini 3.8 Flash reports · 36
GPQA Diamond95.3% ↗not reported——
LMArena Elo1494.8 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)64.3% ↗not reported——
CharXiv Reasoning (no tools)86.2% ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)61% ↗epoch runnot reported——
DeepSWE v1.173.7% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)73.8% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)22% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)68.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)19.6% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)31.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPVal-AA v21545 ↗not reported——
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark10% ↗not reported——
HLE-Verified54.9% ↗not reported——
LABBench286.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)54.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)72.5% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)54% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)81.4% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)87.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)91.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)89.3% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0297 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1290.3 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1582.7 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)47% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OSWorld-2.059% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)98.9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)35.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)82.4% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified69.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-bench 2.189.4% ↗not reported——
Terminal-bench 4.019.1% ↗not reported——
Vals Finance Agent v261.4% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)5093.79 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)84.8% ↗not reported——
Only Mercury 2.5 reports · 0
Mercury 2.5 reports nothing Gemini 3.8 Flash does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 3.8 Flash minus Mercury 2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 3.8 FlashMercury 2.5Edge
Context window1.0M tokens260K tokensGemini 3.8 Flash
Max output66K tokens66K tokensTie
Input price / 1M$0.75 ↗$0.2 ↗Mercury 2.5
Output price / 1M$3.75 ↗$0.75 ↗Mercury 2.5
Cached input / 1M$0.075 ↗$0.02 ↗Mercury 2.5
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$4.5$0.95Mercury 2.5
Modalitiestext · vision · audiotextGemini 3.8 Flash
Released2026-09-022026-09-08—
Cited benchmark scores431—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs …

More matchups

Mercury 2.5 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 3.8 Flash and Mercury 2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.