Compare / head-to-head

Grok 4.6vsMercury 2.5

Grok 4.6 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Mercury 2.5 is 8.4x cheaper per token. Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 0
Grok 4.6 leads
Cheaper per token
Mercury 2.5
8.4x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Grok 4.6
500K tokens
Providers
2 providers
xAI · Inception
Grok 4.6
xAI · released 2026-08-12
textvision
Context
500K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$6 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.5
Scores
43 · 9 core
Mercury 2.5
Inception · released 2026-09-08
text
Context
260K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
$0.2 ↗
Output /1M
$0.75 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.02
Scores
1 · 0 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Mercury 2.5ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)17.2% ↗0% ↗+17.2 ptGrok 4.6
Only Grok 4.6 reports · 37
GPQA Diamond94% ↗epoch runnot reported——
LMArena Elo1453.8 ↗not reported——
AA-Briefcase1577 ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents57.5% ↗not reported——
APEX-Agents (Mercor)65.3% ↗not reported——
APEX-SWE56.4% ↗not reported——
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index61 ↗not reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)40% ↗epoch runnot reported——
CursorBench 3.269.9% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.165.9% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)67.5% ↗not reported——
EBR-bench (Epoch AI run)30.5% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended)61.3% ↗not reported——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)31.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)66% ↗epoch runnot reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)25.3% ↗not reported——
Furniture Assembly (Epoch AI run)40% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GDPVal-AA v21753 ↗not reported——
Harvey LAB (Vals)15.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)57% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)76.8% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)73.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)71.9% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)83.7% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)92.6% ↗not reported——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)90.5% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0128 ↗not reported——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1263.5 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1619.5 ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)34% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)99.2% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)28.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)75.9% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA Verified49.3% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Terminal-Bench 3.026% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)9047.03 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)67.3% ↗not reported——
Only Mercury 2.5 reports · 0
Mercury 2.5 reports nothing Grok 4.6 does not.
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Grok 4.6 minus Mercury 2.5 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGrok 4.6Mercury 2.5Edge
Context window500K tokens260K tokensGrok 4.6
Max output—66K tokens—
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.2 ↗Mercury 2.5
Output price / 1M$6 ↗$0.75 ↗Mercury 2.5
Cached input / 1M$0.5 ↗$0.02 ↗Mercury 2.5
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$8$0.95Mercury 2.5
Modalitiestext · visiontextGrok 4.6
Released2026-08-122026-09-08—
Cited benchmark scores431—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Grok 4.6 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Grok 4.6 and Mercury 2.5 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.