Compare / head-to-head
MiMo-V2.5vsQwen3.6-Plus
Qwen3.6-Plus leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 1M-token context window.
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Qwen3.6-Plus leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
— · —
Xiaomi MiMo · Qwen
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi MiMo
textvision
- Context
- 1M
- Max out
- —
- Input /1M
- —
- Output /1M
- —
- Cached /1M
- —
- Scores
- 7 · 1 core
Qwen3.6-Plus
Qwen · released 2026-04-02
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 6 only MiMo-V2.5 · 5 only Qwen3.6-Plus| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6-Plus | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1427.4 ↗ | 1436.7 ↗ | -9.3 | Qwen3.6-Plus |
| Only MiMo-V2.5 reports · 6 | ||||
| ChartQA | 81.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DocVQA | 93.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| InfoVQA | 72.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU | 55.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMMU-Pro | 38.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| ScienceQA Visual | 97.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.6-Plus reports · 5 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 88.4% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 38.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 93.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 44.1% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 57.9% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiMo-V2.5 minus Qwen3.6-Plus in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | MiMo-V2.5 | Qwen3.6-Plus | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens | Tie |
| Max output | — | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | — | $0.276 ↗ | — |
| Output price / 1M | — | $1.65 ↗ | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | — | $1.93 | — |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | — | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 7 | 6 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
MiMo-V2.5 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.6-Plus vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiMo-V2.5 and Qwen3.6-Plus on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.