Compare / head-to-head

MiMo-V2.6-FlashvsMuse Spark 1.2

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 split their 7 shared benchmarks evenly. Muse Spark 1.2 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 3
even split
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
Muse Spark 1.2
1.0M tokens
Providers
2 providers
Xiaomi MiMo · Meta
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi MiMo · released 2026-09-21
textvisionaudiovideo
Context
1M
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
12 · 3 core
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · released 2026-08-05
textvisionvideoaudio
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
23 · 5 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.2ΔEdge
Reported by both · 7
LMArena Elo1451.8 ↗1493.5 ↗-41.7Muse Spark 1.2
DeepSWE v1.167.9% ↗59.3% ↗+8.6 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Agent (LMArena)-0.0057 ↗-0.0327 ↗0Tie
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1247.5 ↗1292.8 ↗-45.3Muse Spark 1.2
SAGE (Vals AI)43.5% ↗47.7% ↗-4.2 ptMuse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench 2.187.6% ↗82.9% ↗+4.7 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)24.2% ↗6.1% ↗+18.1 ptMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash reports · 5
Agents' Last Exam27.6% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench 1.0.652.3% ↗not reported——
JobBench61.2% ↗not reported——
OSWorld-Verified80.8% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.028.8% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.2 reports · 16
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported36.4% ↗——
DeepSWE v1.1 (Datacurve)not reported54.9% ↗——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)not reported12% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported57.6% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported77.5% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported76.5% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported74.3% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported78.6% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported91.2% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported90% ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1531.8 ↗——
MCP Atlasnot reported90.3% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported74.5% ↗——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported60.3% ↗epoch run——
Toolathlon-Verified (HKUST)not reported75.9% ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported60.3% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is MiMo-V2.6-Flash minus Muse Spark 1.2 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Spark 1.2Edge
Context window1M tokens1.0M tokensMuse Spark 1.2
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$4.25 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$5.5—
Modalitiestext · vision · audio · videotext · vision · video · audioTie
Released2026-09-212026-08-05—
Cited benchmark scores1223—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs …

More matchups

Muse Spark 1.2 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.2 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.