Compare / head-to-head

Muse SparkvsMuse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 3 of 4 shared benchmarks.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
1 – 3
Muse Spark 1.3 leads
Cheaper per token
—
list price, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
Meta
same provider
Muse Spark
Meta · released 2026-04-08
textvision
Context
—
Max out
—
Input /1M
—
Output /1M
—
Cached /1M
—
Scores
19 · 8 core
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta · released 2026-09-02
textvisionvideo
Context
1.0M
Max out
—
Input /1M
$1.25 ↗
Output /1M
$4.25 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.15
Scores
29 · 7 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkMuse SparkMuse Spark 1.3ΔEdge
Reported by both · 4
LMArena Elo1489.3 ↗1494.3 ↗-5Muse Spark 1.3
DeepSearchQA74.8% ↗90.3% ↗-15.5 ptMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision (LMArena)1293.6 ↗1290.2 ↗+3.4Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)88.9% ↗epoch run99.2% ↗epoch run-10.3 ptMuse Spark 1.3
Only Muse Spark reports · 14
SWE-bench Verified77.4% ↗not reported——
GPQA Diamond89.5% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (no tools)42.8% ↗not reported——
ARC AGI 2 (Public)42.5% ↗not reported——
CharXiv Reasoning86.4% ↗not reported——
HealthBench Hard42.8% ↗not reported——
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)50.4% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench Pro80% ↗not reported——
MedXpertQA (MM)78.4% ↗not reported——
MMMU Pro80.4% ↗not reported——
ScreenSpot Pro (With Python)84.1% ↗not reported——
SimpleVQA71.3% ↗not reported——
SWE-Bench Pro52.4% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 2.059% ↗not reported——
Only Muse Spark 1.3 reports · 25
APEX-Agents (Mercor)not reported57.8% ↗——
AutomationBenchnot reported49.6% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported38% ↗epoch run——
DeepSWE v1.1not reported75.4% ↗——
FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported46.3% ↗epoch run——
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run)not reported74.4% ↗epoch run——
GDPval-AA v2not reported1754 ↗——
JobBenchnot reported64.9% ↗——
LiveBench Agentic Coding (LiveBench)not reported64.1% ↗——
LiveBench Coding (LiveBench)not reported81.1% ↗——
LiveBench Data Analysis (LiveBench)not reported79.6% ↗——
LiveBench Instruction Following (LiveBench)not reported78% ↗——
LiveBench Language (LiveBench)not reported82.8% ↗——
LiveBench Mathematics (LiveBench)not reported95.9% ↗——
LiveBench Reasoning (LiveBench)not reported89.7% ↗——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)not reported0.04 ↗——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)not reported1656.6 ↗——
MRCR 256K-512Knot reported98.5% ↗——
MRCR 512K-1Mnot reported98.1% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported25% ↗epoch run——
OSWorld 2.0 (partial)not reported66.9% ↗——
SimpleBench (SimpleBench)not reported81.8% ↗——
SWE-Atlas Codebase QnAnot reported59.4% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 2.1not reported88.8% ↗——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)not reported24.7% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Muse Spark minus Muse Spark 1.3 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecMuse SparkMuse Spark 1.3Edge
Context window—1.0M tokens—
Max output———
Input price / 1M—$1.25 ↗—
Output price / 1M—$4.25 ↗—
Cached input / 1M—$0.15 ↗—
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
—$5.5—
Modalitiestext · visiontext · vision · videoMuse Spark 1.3
Released2026-04-082026-09-02—
Cited benchmark scores1929—
Reliability

Meta status

All providers →
More matchups

Muse Spark 1.3 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Muse Spark and Muse Spark 1.3 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.