Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507vsQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads 11 of 14 shared benchmarks. Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is 2.2x cheaper per token. Both offer a 262K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
3 – 11
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
2.2x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-21
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$0.92 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 6 core
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 14
MMLU-Pro83% ↗84.4% ↗-1.4 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Elo1422.4 ↗1400 ↗+22.4Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
AIME2570.3% ↗92.3% ↗-22 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Arena-Hard v279.2% ↗79.7% ↗-0.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
BFCL-v370.9% ↗71.9% ↗-1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
GPQA77.5% ↗81.1% ↗-3.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
HMMT2555.4% ↗83.9% ↗-28.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
IFEval88.7% ↗87.8% ↗+0.9 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
LiveBench 2024112575.4% ↗78.4% ↗-3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)51.8% ↗74.1% ↗-22.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Redux93.1% ↗93.8% ↗-0.7 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
SuperGPQA62.6% ↗64.9% ↗-2.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
TAU2-Retail74.6% ↗71.9% ↗+2.7 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)38.7% ↗41% ↗-2.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 reports · 3
Aider-Polyglot57.3% ↗not reported——
ARC-AGI41.8% ↗not reported——
SimpleQA54.3% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 9
GPQA Diamondnot reported80.1% ↗epoch run——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported12% ↗epoch run——
HLE (text-only)not reported18.2% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported9% ↗epoch run——
OJBenchnot reported32.5% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported86.7% ↗epoch run——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported40.4% ↗epoch run——
TAU2-Airlinenot reported58% ↗——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)not reported-11.34 ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 minus Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Edge
Context window262K tokens262K tokensTie
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.23 ↗$0.23 ↗Tie
Output price / 1M$0.92 ↗$2.3 ↗Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$1.15$2.53Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-07-212025-07-25—
Cited benchmark scores1723—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.