Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads 13 of 14 shared benchmarks. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper per token. Both offer a 262K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
13 – 1
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
1.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen · released 2025-09-11
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.15 ↗
Output /1M
$1.2 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
16 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructΔEdge
Reported by both · 14
MMLU-Pro84.4% ↗80.6% ↗+3.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Elo1400 ↗1399 ↗+1Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
AIME2592.3% ↗69.5% ↗+22.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Arena-Hard v279.7% ↗82.7% ↗-3 ptQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
BFCL-v371.9% ↗70.3% ↗+1.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
GPQA81.1% ↗72.9% ↗+8.2 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
HMMT2583.9% ↗54.1% ↗+29.8 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
IFEval87.8% ↗87.6% ↗+0.2 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LiveBench 2024112578.4% ↗75.8% ↗+2.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)74.1% ↗56.6% ↗+17.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
MMLU-Redux93.8% ↗90.9% ↗+2.9 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
SuperGPQA64.9% ↗58.8% ↗+6.1 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
TAU2-Airline58% ↗45.5% ↗+12.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
TAU2-Retail71.9% ↗57.3% ↗+14.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 9
GPQA Diamond80.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)12% ↗epoch runnot reported——
HLE (text-only)18.2% ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OJBench32.5% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)86.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleQA Verified40.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)-11.34 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)41% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct reports · 2
Aider-Polyglotnot reported49.8% ↗——
MultiPL-Enot reported87.8% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 minus Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructEdge
Context window262K tokens262K tokensTie
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.23 ↗$0.15 ↗Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Output price / 1M$2.3 ↗$1.2 ↗Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.53$1.35Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2025-07-252025-09-11—
Cited benchmark scores2316—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.