Compare / head-to-head
Claude Opus 4vsGPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Claude Opus 4 is 2.1x cheaper per token. GPT-5.2 Pro has the larger context window (400K tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
Claude Opus 4
2.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-5.2 Pro
400K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 94.2446%
Anthropic · OpenAI
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic · released 2025-05-22
textvision
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 5 only Claude Opus 4 · 9 only GPT-5.2 Pro| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | GPT-5.2 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% ↗epoch | 93.2% ↗ | -16.9 pt | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Only Claude Opus 4 reports · 5 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2024 (no extended thinking) | 33.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 64.4% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 70.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-bench | 43.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.2 Pro reports · 9 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 100% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 36.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 90.5% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 54.2% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 77.9% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 46% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 74% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 74.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 50% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Claude Opus 4 minus GPT-5.2 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Claude Opus 4 | GPT-5.2 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 200K tokens | 400K tokens | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Max output | 32K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Input price / 1M | $15 ↗ | $21 ↗ | Claude Opus 4 |
| Output price / 1M | $75 ↗ | $168 ↗ | Claude Opus 4 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $90 | $189 | Claude Opus 4 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 6 | 10 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Claude Opus 4 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.2 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Claude Opus 4 and GPT-5.2 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.