ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Command R+vsERNIE 5.1

ERNIE 5.1 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Both offer a 128K-token context window.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
ERNIE 5.1 leads
Cheaper per token
list price, input + output
Larger context
Tie
both 128K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Baidu
Command R+
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
Context
128K
Max out
4K
Input /1M
$2.5
Output /1M
$10
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
ERNIE 5.1
Baidu · released 2026-05-09
text
Context
128K
Max out
66K
Input /1M
Output /1M
Cached /1M
Scores
2 · 2 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkCommand R+ERNIE 5.1ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1203.7 1468.2 -264.5ERNIE 5.1
Only Command R+ reports · 0
Command R+ reports nothing ERNIE 5.1 does not.
Only ERNIE 5.1 reports · 1
AIME 2026 (with tools)not reported99.6%
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R+ minus ERNIE 5.1 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecCommand R+ERNIE 5.1Edge
Context window128K tokens128K tokensTie
Max output4K tokens66K tokensERNIE 5.1
Input price / 1M$2.5
Output price / 1M$10
Cached input / 1M
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12.5
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2024-08-302026-05-09
Cited benchmark scores12
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Command R+ vs …

More matchups

ERNIE 5.1 vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R+ and ERNIE 5.1 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.