Compare / head-to-head
Command R+vsGemini 3.7 Flash
Command R+ and Gemini 3.7 Flash do not yet share a public benchmark, so quality cannot be compared apples-to-apples. Gemini 3.7 Flash is 2.8x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0
no overlap yet
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.7 Flash
2.8x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.7 Flash
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 100%
Cohere · Google
Command R+
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google · released 2026-08-13
textvisionaudio
Quality
Benchmark matrix
0 shared · 1 only Command R+ · 14 only Gemini 3.7 Flash| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 0 | ||||
| No public benchmark is reported for both models yet. | ||||
| Only Command R+ reports · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1203.7 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Gemini 3.7 Flash reports · 14 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 94.8% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | not reported | 56 ↗ | — | — |
| Code Arena | not reported | 1588 ↗ | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | not reported | 65.3% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierCode 1.1 | not reported | 43.6% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 36.6% ↗epoch | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 71.6% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | not reported | 1525 ↗ | — | — |
| HLE-Verified | not reported | 53.6% ↗ | — | — |
| OSWorld-2.0 | not reported | 47.9% ↗ | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 97.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | not reported | 69.2% ↗epoch | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | not reported | 85.8% ↗ | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 3.0 | not reported | 14.9% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R+ minus Gemini 3.7 Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R+ | Gemini 3.7 Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Max output | 4K tokens | 66K tokens | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Input price / 1M | $2.5 ↗ | $0.75 ↗ | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | $3.75 ↗ | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.075 ↗ | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $12.5 | $4.5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Modalities | text | text · vision · audio | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-08-13 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 14 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R+ vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Gemini 3.7 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R+ and Gemini 3.7 Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.