ModelsCompareBest forBenchmarksStatusPricingAPI
Compare / head-to-head

Command R+vsGLM-4.6

GLM-4.6 leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. GLM-4.6 is 4.5x cheaper per token. GLM-4.6 has the larger context window (200K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
GLM-4.6 leads
Cheaper per token
GLM-4.6
4.5x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GLM-4.6
200K tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Z.ai
Command R+
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
Context
128K
Max out
4K
Input /1M
$2.5
Output /1M
$10
Cached /1M
Scores
1 · 1 core
text
Context
200K
Max out
131K
Input /1M
$0.6
Output /1M
$2.2
Cached /1M
$0.11
Scores
2 · 2 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkCommand R+GLM-4.6ΔEdge
Reported by both · 1
LMArena Elo1203.7 1440.5 -236.8GLM-4.6
Only Command R+ reports · 0
Command R+ reports nothing GLM-4.6 does not.
Only GLM-4.6 reports · 1
AIME 2025not reported91.7% matharena
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R+ minus GLM-4.6 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecCommand R+GLM-4.6Edge
Context window128K tokens200K tokensGLM-4.6
Max output4K tokens131K tokensGLM-4.6
Input price / 1M$2.5 $0.6 GLM-4.6
Output price / 1M$10 $2.2 GLM-4.6
Cached input / 1M$0.11
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12.5$2.8GLM-4.6
ModalitiestexttextTie
Released2024-08-30
Cited benchmark scores12
Reliability

Provider status

All providers
More matchups

Command R+ vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R+ and GLM-4.6 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.