Compare / head-to-head
Command R+vsQwen3.7-Plus
Qwen3.7-Plus leads 1 of 1 shared benchmark. Qwen3.7-Plus is 9.1x cheaper per token. Qwen3.7-Plus has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 1
Qwen3.7-Plus leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.7-Plus
9.1x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.7-Plus
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · —
Cohere · Qwen
Command R+
Cohere · released 2024-08-30
text
Qwen3.7-Plus
Qwen · released 2026-05-26
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
1 shared · 0 only Command R+ · 2 only Qwen3.7-Plus| Benchmark | Command R+ | Qwen3.7-Plus | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 1 | ||||
| LMArena Elo | 1203.7 ↗ | 1454.2 ↗ | -250.5 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Only Command R+ reports · 0 | ||||
| Command R+ reports nothing Qwen3.7-Plus does not. | ||||
| Only Qwen3.7-Plus reports · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | not reported | 87.9% ↗epoch | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 93.3% ↗epoch | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Command R+ minus Qwen3.7-Plus in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Command R+ | Qwen3.7-Plus | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Max output | 4K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $2.5 ↗ | $0.276 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Output price / 1M | $10 ↗ | $1.1 ↗ | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $12.5 | $1.38 | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Modalities | text | text · vision | Qwen3.7-Plus |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-05-26 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 1 | 3 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Command R+ vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.7-Plus vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Command R+ and Qwen3.7-Plus on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.