Compare / head-to-head
Gemini 3.8 FlashvsGPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro leads 2 of 3 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.8 Flash is 42x cheaper per token. Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
1 – 2
GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
Gemini 3.8 Flash
42x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Gemini 3.8 Flash
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
100% · 94.2446%
Google · OpenAI
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google · released 2026-09-02
textvisionaudio
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
3 shared · 12 only Gemini 3.8 Flash · 7 only GPT-5.2 Pro| Benchmark | Gemini 3.8 Flash | GPT-5.2 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 3 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 95.3% ↗ | 93.2% ↗ | +2.1 pt | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 22% ↗epoch | 46% ↗epoch | -24 pt | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 68.4% ↗epoch | 74% ↗epoch | -5.6 pt | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Only Gemini 3.8 Flash reports · 12 | ||||
| CharXiv Reasoning (no tools) | 86.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 73.7% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| GDPVal-AA v2 | 1545 ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 10% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| HLE-Verified | 54.9% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| LABBench2 | 86.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-2.0 | 59% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 98.9% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 69.7% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 2.1 | 89.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-bench 4.0 | 19.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Vals Finance Agent v2 | 61.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.2 Pro reports · 7 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 100% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 36.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 90.5% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 54.2% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 77.9% ↗ | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 74.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 50% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 3.8 Flash minus GPT-5.2 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | Gemini 3.8 Flash | GPT-5.2 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 400K tokens | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Max output | 66K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Input price / 1M | $0.75 ↗ | $21 ↗ | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $3.75 ↗ | $168 ↗ | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.075 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $4.5 | $189 | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision · audio | text · vision | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 16 | 10 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.2 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-5.2 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.