Compare / head-to-head

Gemini 4 ArgonvsQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507

Gemini 4 Argon leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.7x cheaper per token.

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
2 – 0
Gemini 4 Argon leads
Cheaper per token
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
4.7x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
—
unknown
Providers
2 providers
Google · Qwen
Gemini 4 Argon
Google · released 2026-09-30
textvisionvideo
Context
—
Max out
1M
Input /1M
$2 ↗
Output /1M
$10 ↗
Cached /1M
$0.1
Scores
12 · 3 core
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507ΔEdge
Reported by both · 2
LMArena Elo1525.2 ↗1400 ↗+125.2Gemini 4 Argon
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)13718.16 ↗-11.34 ↗+13729.5Gemini 4 Argon
Only Gemini 4 Argon reports · 10
APEX-Agents (Mercor)82.2% ↗not reported——
AutomationBench51.3% ↗not reported——
CWE-bench v168% ↗not reported——
DeepSWE v1.177.9% ↗not reported——
FrontierSWE V2 (Proximal Labs)55% ↗not reported——
LMArena Agent (LMArena)0.0757 ↗not reported——
LMArena WebDev (LMArena)1679.5 ↗not reported——
LVBench91.7% ↗not reported——
SAGE (Vals AI)53.6% ↗not reported——
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Vals AI)57.6% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 21
GPQA Diamondnot reported80.1% ↗epoch run——
MMLU-Pronot reported84.4% ↗——
AIME25not reported92.3% ↗——
Arena-Hard v2not reported79.7% ↗——
BFCL-v3not reported71.9% ↗——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported12% ↗epoch run——
GPQAnot reported81.1% ↗——
HLE (text-only)not reported18.2% ↗——
HMMT25not reported83.9% ↗——
IFEvalnot reported87.8% ↗——
LiveBench 20241125not reported78.4% ↗——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)not reported74.1% ↗——
MMLU-Reduxnot reported93.8% ↗——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)not reported9% ↗epoch run——
OJBenchnot reported32.5% ↗——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)not reported86.7% ↗epoch run——
SimpleQA Verifiednot reported40.4% ↗epoch run——
SuperGPQAnot reported64.9% ↗——
TAU2-Airlinenot reported58% ↗——
TAU2-Retailnot reported71.9% ↗——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)not reported41% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Gemini 4 Argon minus Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecGemini 4 ArgonQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Edge
Context window—262K tokens—
Max output1M tokens——
Input price / 1M$2 ↗$0.23 ↗Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Output price / 1M$10 ↗$2.3 ↗Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Cached input / 1M$0.1 ↗——
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$12$2.53Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Modalitiestext · vision · videotextGemini 4 Argon
Released2026-09-302025-07-25—
Cited benchmark scores1223—
Reliability

Provider status

All providers →
More matchups

Gemini 4 Argon vs …

Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.