Compare / head-to-head
GPT-5.4 nanovsQwen3.6-Flash
GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3.6-Flash split their 4 shared benchmarks evenly. Qwen3.6-Flash is 1.3x cheaper per token. Qwen3.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
2 – 2
even split
Cheaper per token
Qwen3.6-Flash
1.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3.6-Flash
1M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
94.2446% · —
OpenAI · Qwen
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI · released 2026-03-17
textvision
Qwen3.6-Flash
Qwen · released 2026-04-16
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
4 shared · 5 only GPT-5.4 nano · 0 only Qwen3.6-Flash| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 nano | Qwen3.6-Flash | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 4 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 82.8% ↗ | 83.3% ↗epoch | -0.5 pt | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 44.9% ↗epoch | 17.2% ↗epoch | +27.7 pt | GPT-5.4 nano |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 87.8% ↗epoch | 84.4% ↗epoch | +3.4 pt | GPT-5.4 nano |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% ↗epoch | 15.9% ↗epoch | -4.2 pt | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Only GPT-5.4 nano reports · 5 | ||||
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 12.2% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 39% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 52.4% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 46.3% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Toolathlon | 35.5% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only Qwen3.6-Flash reports · 0 | ||||
| Qwen3.6-Flash reports nothing GPT-5.4 nano does not. | ||||
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-5.4 nano minus Qwen3.6-Flash in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-5.4 nano | Qwen3.6-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 400K tokens | 1M tokens | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Max output | 128K tokens | — | — |
| Input price / 1M | $0.2 ↗ | $0.165 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 ↗ | $0.99 ↗ | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.02 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $1.45 | $1.16 | Qwen3.6-Flash |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2026-03-17 | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 10 | 4 | — |
Reliability
Provider status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-5.4 nano vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
Qwen3.6-Flash vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-5.4 nano and Qwen3.6-Flash on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.