Compare / head-to-head

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct

Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads 7 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct is 1.3x cheaper per token. Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 has the larger context window (262K tokens).

Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.

Shared benchmarks
7 – 1
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 leads · 1 tied
Cheaper per token
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
1.3x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
262K tokens
Providers
Qwen
same provider
Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen · released 2025-07-25
text
Context
262K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.23 ↗
Output /1M
$2.3 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
23 · 10 core
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
Qwen · released 2025-09-23
textvisionvideo
Context
256K
Max out
—
Input /1M
$0.4 ↗
Output /1M
$1.6 ↗
Cached /1M
—
Scores
17 · 6 core
Quality

Benchmark matrix

BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B InstructΔEdge
Reported by both · 9
MMLU-Pro84.4% ↗81.8% ↗+2.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Elo1400 ↗1413.4 ↗-13.4Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
AIME2592.3% ↗74.7% ↗+17.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Arena-Hard v279.7% ↗77.4% ↗+2.3 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
BFCL-v371.9% ↗67.7% ↗+4.2 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
HMMT2583.9% ↗57.4% ↗+26.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
IFEval87.8% ↗87.8% ↗0Tie
MMLU-Redux93.8% ↗92.2% ↗+1.6 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
SuperGPQA64.9% ↗60.4% ↗+4.5 ptQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Only Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 reports · 14
GPQA Diamond80.1% ↗epoch runnot reported——
Chess Puzzles (Epoch AI run)12% ↗epoch runnot reported——
GPQA81.1% ↗not reported——
HLE (text-only)18.2% ↗not reported——
LiveBench 2024112578.4% ↗not reported——
LiveCodeBench v6 (25.02-25.05)74.1% ↗not reported——
Mystery Game Puzzles (Epoch AI run)9% ↗epoch runnot reported——
OJBench32.5% ↗not reported——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run)86.7% ↗epoch runnot reported——
SimpleQA Verified40.4% ↗epoch runnot reported——
TAU2-Airline58% ↗not reported——
TAU2-Retail71.9% ↗not reported——
Vending-Bench 2 (Andon Labs)-11.34 ↗not reported——
WeirdML (Håvard Tveit Ihle)41% ↗not reported——
Only Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct reports · 8
LCBV6 (25.02-25.05)not reported54.3% ↗——
LMArena Vision (LMArena)not reported1215.1 ↗——
MathVista (mini)not reported84.9% ↗——
MMMU (val)not reported78.7% ↗——
MMMU_Pronot reported68.1% ↗——
ScreenSpot Pronot reported62% ↗——
SimpleQAnot reported51.9% ↗——
VideoMME (w/o sub)not reported79.2% ↗——
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 minus Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing

Side by side

SpecQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B InstructEdge
Context window262K tokens256K tokensQwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Max output———
Input price / 1M$0.23 ↗$0.4 ↗Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507
Output price / 1M$2.3 ↗$1.6 ↗Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
Cached input / 1M———
Input + output / 1M
Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded.
$2.53$2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
Modalitiestexttext · vision · videoQwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct
Released2025-07-252025-09-23—
Cited benchmark scores2317—
Reliability

Qwen status

All providers →
Built by Respan
Which one wins on your data?

Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run Qwen3 235B-A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Instruct on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.