Compare / head-to-head
GPT-4.1vsGPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro leads 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-4.1 is 18.9x cheaper per token. GPT-4.1 has the larger context window (1.0M tokens).
Benchmarks from cited public sources; pricing from official pages; status from official provider feeds.
Shared benchmarks
0 – 2
GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Cheaper per token
GPT-4.1
18.9x cheaper, input + output
Larger context
GPT-4.1
1.0M tokens
Provider uptime (30d)
94.306%
OpenAI
GPT-4.1
OpenAI · released 2025-04-14
textvision
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI · released 2025-12-11
textvision
Quality
Benchmark matrix
2 shared · 7 only GPT-4.1 · 8 only GPT-5.2 Pro| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | Δ | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported by both · 2 | ||||
| GPQA Diamond | 66.3% ↗ | 93.2% ↗ | -26.9 pt | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 v2 (Epoch AI run) | 6% ↗epoch | 74% ↗epoch | -68 pt | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Only GPT-4.1 reports · 7 | ||||
| SWE-bench Verified | 54.6% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| MMLU | 90.2% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| AIME 2024 | 48.1% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 (Epoch AI run) | 38.3% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 31.1% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI run) | 48.5% ↗epoch | not reported | — | — |
| Video-MME (long, no subtitles) | 72% ↗ | not reported | — | — |
| Only GPT-5.2 Pro reports · 8 | ||||
| AIME 2025 | not reported | 100% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (no tools) | not reported | 36.6% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 (Verified) | not reported | 90.5% ↗ | — | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 (Verified) | not reported | 54.2% ↗ | — | — |
| BrowseComp | not reported | 77.9% ↗ | — | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 v2 (Epoch AI run) | not reported | 46% ↗epoch | — | — |
| GDPval (wins or ties) | not reported | 74.1% ↗ | — | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) | not reported | 50% ↗ | — | — |
Scores tagged "epoch" or "matharena" are independent runs, used only where the lab has not published its own; ⚠ marks rows MathArena flags as released after the competition. Higher is better on every row. Δ is GPT-4.1 minus GPT-5.2 Pro in the benchmark's own unit. "Not reported" means the lab has not published that figure; it is not a zero. ↗ opens the source.
Specs & pricing
Side by side
Official pricing pages and model cards| Spec | GPT-4.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 400K tokens | GPT-4.1 |
| Max output | 33K tokens | 128K tokens | GPT-5.2 Pro |
| Input price / 1M | $2 ↗ | $21 ↗ | GPT-4.1 |
| Output price / 1M | $8 ↗ | $168 ↗ | GPT-4.1 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.5 ↗ | — | — |
| Input + output / 1M Lower is cheaper. List prices; batch, tool and regional fees excluded. | $10 | $189 | GPT-4.1 |
| Modalities | text · vision | text · vision | Tie |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Cited benchmark scores | 10 | 10 | — |
Reliability
OpenAI status
Last 60 days · refreshed daily on this page · live on /statusMore matchups
GPT-4.1 vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksMore matchups
GPT-5.2 Pro vs …
Models sharing the most benchmarksBuilt by Respan
Which one wins on your data?
Public benchmarks are a starting point. Run GPT-4.1 and GPT-5.2 Pro on your own prompts with Respan evals, or route to either through one gateway key with automatic failover.